Hot Cutovers Help Provide Operator Learning Curve Time

by | Jul 21, 2009 | Operator Performance, Services, Consulting & Training | 0 comments

Today is the first of two guest blog posts this week. Aaron Crews graciously agreed to write this while I’m goofing off this week on vacation. Thanks Aaron!

Jim is a brave soul to hand over the keys to the blog while he’s on vacation this week. Hopefully I don’t do too much damage while he’s gone. If I do, maybe Mike Boudreaux can help me roll back the odometer before Jim returns.
As you might remember from some previous posts on this blog, I am an engineer with The Automation Group (TAG), which is part of the Emerson Process Management family. We provide management and technical services for all types of process control system projects. I thought I would take this opportunity to share a story from one of my past projects.
Here at TAG, one major focus of our work is on DCS modernization projects. These projects arise for a variety of reasons, usually including system maintenance issues, a desire to take advantage of new technologies, and to improve overall plant performance.
A big part of this last goal depends on the operators. The importance of data visualization in the operator interface, alarm management, and human-centered design within the HMI have all been hot topics for that reason. In a modernization project, however, that is only part of the equation.
The operator is required to make a big adjustment from the old system to the new one. Graphics may look totally different, navigation between screens is done in a different way, alarm notification and acknowledgement isn’t the same as it used to be, and even the way in which the operator physically interacts with the control system can be different.
Every project includes an operator training component, but as anyone who has been through training knows, it’s different once you’re on your own. That is one reason why we usually recommend a hot cutover between the old and new systems – so that operations gets some transition time and experience before the critical parts of the process are cut over.
On this particular project, however, the trepidation from plant operations was especially strong. In migrating from RS3 to DeltaV, they were changing from a dedicated keyboard with a trackball and keys with particular functions that they had memorized to a traditional keyboard and mouse. After going through some training and getting their hands on the new system, the operators began to feel like it just wasn’t going to work for them. Pretty soon, a dedicated keyboard had become a make or break issue for the project.
It was hard to disagree with how they felt. As a “power user” of several pieces of software, I know I can work dramatically faster and more productively when I utilize keyboard shortcuts. Eventually everyone will get used to the new system, but the process doesn’t stop and wait for operators to work their way back up to speed.
As an engineer, though, I appreciate a challenge, and I was able to come up with a solution that would please the operators, mitigate the safety and production risks associated with the modernization, and put the project back on track. Using the flexibility of the DeltaV system and its built-in key macro functionality, my project team customized a commercial off-the-shelf, physical, programmable keyboard for DeltaV.
The top half of the keyboard was dedicated to display navigation, giving the operator single-button access to any graphic. The bottom half of the keyboard had a layout designed to mimic that of their RS3 keyboards, with analogous functions assigned to each key.
Needless to say, the keyboards were a hit. They didn’t require custom software on the DeltaV stations, they didn’t require specialized knowledge to maintain or replace, and the fixed-button layout allowed for quick “muscle-memory” reaction to the process while always keeping the operator focused on what he is doing and not how to do it. The keyboards were not required so eventually they could be removed if the operators decided that they prefer the regular keyboard and mouse.
Half of the 5000+ I/O was cut over hot, and the rest was cut over during a short turnaround, and the plant was brought back up without incident. I have visited the plant several times since then as they have gone through a couple of DeltaV upgrades and the keyboards are still going strong. They are enjoying all the advantages of DeltaV and experiencing none of the worries that they had with their previous generation control system.
Thanks again to Jim for the invitation to contribute here. If you’d like to learn more about what we are up to at TAG or if you have any questions, you can email me, follow me on twitter, or find us on Facebook.

Popular Posts



Related Posts

Follow Us

We invite you to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest news, events and innovations that will help you face and solve your toughest challenges.

Do you want to reuse or translate content?

Just post a link to the entry and send us a quick note so we can share your work. Thank you very much.

Our Global Community

Emerson Exchange 365

The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of the authors. Content published here is not read or approved by Emerson before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Emerson.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By :