Eliminating Temperature Effects in DP Level Measurement - Emerson Automation Experts

Eliminating Temperature Effects in DP Level Measurement

Differential pressure (DP) measurement has long been used in tank and other vessel level measurement. Level is calculated by taking the difference in pressure divided by the specific gravity of the liquid. I caught up with Emerson’s Anshuman Prasad, a member of the Rosemount pressure measurement team.

Differential Pressure Level MeasurementHe described four traditional ways of measuring the differential pressure for level applications: wet leg, wet/dry leg, tuned system, and balanced system. Wet leg/dry legs were historically used to connect the transmitter to the vessel’s pressure flanges. Typically, this is a high-maintenance connection system and has issues with evaporation (for wet legs) and condensation (for dry legs), which contribute to inaccurate pressure measurements.

In a wet leg arrangement, the capillary tubes on both sides leading to the DP transmitter are filled with liquid.

Before describing the balanced system and tuned system, it will help to understand the temperature effect associated with capillary systems. Temperature effect has two components–seal temperature effect and head temperature effect. Seal temperature effect is caused by the backpressure generated on the sensing diaphragm when the ambient temperature changes. This causes an expansion / contraction of the fill fluid in the capillary. Head temperature effect is caused by changes in the weight of the capillary fill fluid due to density variation with varying ambient temperatures exerting backpressure on the sensing diaphragm.

In a balanced system, capillaries are the same length on both the high-pressure side and low-pressure side. Traditionally, it was believed that the same length capillary would offset the temperature effect in the capillaries. However, it only offsets the seal temperature effect and still leaves behind the head temperature effect. That gave way to tuned systems where the high side is direct mounted and low side uses a capillary.

Tuned systems use the asymmetry of the system to balance seal temperature effects with head temperature effects. It takes advantage of the fact that the two temperature effects act against each other for a given change in ambient temperature. However, errors due to capillaries are not eliminated and the response time of the system is still slow due to capillaries.

Rosemount 3051S Electronic Remote Sensor DP Level MeasurementAnshuman described a new product, Rosemount 3015S Electronic Remote Sensors (ERS), which solves these issues. Two 3051S pressure transmitter are mounted on the high and low side of the tank avoiding the need for capillary tubing. The pressure sensors are linked together with an electrical cable and synchronized to create a single 3051S ERS system, calculating the differential pressure electronically.

The speed of response is no longer limited by capillary tubing since this tubing is no longer required. The issues associated with temperature correction are also eliminated. This ERS technology also reduces the inaccuracies associated with evaporation and condensation as well as the maintenance that was required on the capillary and impulse tubing.

Communicating electronically instead of through capillary tubing also provides a method for difficult measurements including tall distillation columns, storage tanks, pulping vessels, and fermenters. And where cold weather is present, the need for heat tracing on the impulse lines is eliminated.

Anshuman noted that these HART-based devices provide scaling to convert DP into level, volume, and mass measurements and given that it’s a multivariable device, up to 4 variables can be extracted as HART signals using a THUM adapter or a HART splitter (e.g. a 333 TRILOOP).

He shared an example of a brine level measurement application, which had a wet leg installation. Salt crystals would form and plug the impulse lines. This required a complex water injection system to periodically purge the lines and cause the evaporator unit to be taken offline.

By replacing the wet leg installation with the ERS arrangement, the process manufacturer eliminated the line plugging and provided a clearer, more accurate picture of the brine level for the operators.

Another installation at a chemical facility uses ERS to eliminate the daily swings in level (in a buffer tank where level is typically fixed) reading due to change in ambient temperature within the day.

Like in so many other areas of our lives, the replacement of traditional methods with digital communications eliminates many of the workarounds we needed to develop. In this case, the installation gets easier, the measurement performance improves, and the operators have access to more accurate information.

Podcast: MP3



  1. I wanted to share this Q&A that came up on the Facebook Fan page:

    Q: this is very good idea for local viewing of dp value if available in one of transmitters (please let me know),otherwise we can do such with normal 3051L or 3051 CG and calculating the level by dcs software

    A: Calculating the level in DCS software using two separate transmitter is not quite same as an ERS because:

    1) ERS is a single loop power HART device. The DIY solution you explained need two transmitter separately powered. So, more wires + more I/O points being used
    2) DCS computation is not easy to synchronize
    3) Zeroing of the DP system is practically impossible with two separate device. ERS can be zeroed as a system
    4) Time response of the DIY system will be equal to your loop response time (500ms/1s). ERS update rate can be quite fast (depends on the configuration). Will be at least 2-3 times faster than DIY system.

    • Dp Level Transmitter mostly used H side in drum down taping point L side on up side of drum in this condition LRV is -30 URV is -10 but some time we see in special L side in drum down taping point H side on up side of drum range also sweep URV is -30 LRV is -10 why like this ?
      witch condition we use this application ?
      what is benefits of sweeping?
      please explain details

  2. Hillary Portier says:

    Would be interested in understanding the errors introduced on high pressure systems. What are the effect of each pressure transmitter’s accuracy when determining the DP between the two. Are we trading one set of accuracy problems for another?

  3. Jim Cahill says:

    Hi Hillary, Thank you for your comment and questions! I’m checking with some of my friends who manager our Rosemount DP transmitters for their thoughts and will follow up with a second comment.

  4. Jim Cahill says:

    Hi Hillary, I’ll send you an ERS Quick Reference Guide by email but here’s some feedback from one of our level specialists:

    “The issue is the TPE of all transmitter is also based on the Upper Sensor limit. High Static, low DP creates a high % Span error.
    No difference if using two standard transmitters back to the DCS but there are other issue with that as well.”

  5. If the vessel is of horizontal, provide information related to it shall be useful

  6. Ram,

    If the vessel is horizontal, we need to evaluate the differential vs static pressure in the tank to understand if this technology will give you better results than the traditional capillary based system. You can email me if you have something more specific in mind and I will be able to connect you with our specialists for more detailed advice.


  7. Hi I have one very basic question associated with subject topic, would appreciate if some one could help me with it:

    We are measuring DP (0.35 barg is alarm) across the sour water stripper through a DP transmitter with remote seals and capillary tubing. However this instrument was not working fine, we are now replacing it with Emerson ERS system with two similar transmitters 3051SAM type with range of (-1 to 10.35 barg), as per the catalog the accuracy of these two transmitters is 0.035% of span.

    Oper pressure = 1.75 barg
    design pressure = 5.5 barg
    DP alarm set point = 0.35 barg

    Now my question is how accurate would be my DP measurement? As the transmitters themselves are only 0.035 % of span which as per my calculation = 0.035 X (-1 to 10barg = 11) = +/-0.385

    Is it the correct calculation im doing?

    What is term range down? It is mentioned as 150:1

    Which is the most accurate type to measure DP across the columns/absorbers?

    Appreciate if some one can help me with my basic and stupid questions

Leave a Reply