Impact of Single Use Technologies on Automation and Information Management

by | Apr 25, 2013 | Industry, Life Sciences & Medical, Operations & Business Management

Jim Cahill

Jim Cahill

Chief Blogger, Social Marketing Leader

One of the conversations happening among pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers is around the “facility of the future”. I caught up with Emerson’s Gary Mitchell, a consultant on the Life Sciences industry team. He shared some of the trends prompting this relook at how manufacturing processes are designed.

Through modular, hybrid and off-the-shelf designs such as GE KUBio and the NNE Standard Facility, the speed of construction has significantly increased. This allows new facilities to be built closer to the population centers where the medicines will be used.

Single Use Bioreactor (SUB) Control System

Source: Broadley James, https://jimc.me/11FLcah

From a production process standpoint, upstream yields continue to increase as bioreactors shrink in size and increase in number to provide parallel production paths. Many of the production processes including clinical, bulk, fill/finish, and packaging facilities are being consolidated into a single location. And, some of the production equipment, such as bioreactors, centrifuge skids, and chromatography skids can be disposable/single use technologies (SUT).

These SUTs may come with instrumentation and controls included, as do disposable bags used for media and buffers. These changes prompt several questions:

  1. How are pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers managing and tracking these instrumentation and controls from an automation perspective – are DCSs required as much?
  2. Reduced use of on/off valves required for clean-in-place (CIP) / sterilize-in-place (SIP) reduces the need for I/O and associated control logic–does this also reduce the need for traditional DCS?
  3. How are transfers between equipment handled and tracked with less automated on/off valves?
  4. How is material and equipment usage and genealogy being captured–via manufacturing execution systems (MES)?
  5. Are we generating more paper records – again, more need for MES?

Where centralized automation captured much of the data required for the electronic batch records, will the pharmaceutical and biotech plants of the future collect and organize this data via the MES?

Popular Posts

Comments

Follow Us

We invite you to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest news, events and innovations that will help you face and solve your toughest challenges.

Do you want to reuse or translate content?

Just post a link to the entry and send us a quick note so we can share your work. Thank you very much.

Our Global Community

Emerson Exchange 365

The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of the authors. Content published here is not read or approved by Emerson before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Emerson.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com