Justifying New Tech Investment When the Plant Is Running Full Out

by | Apr 15, 2013 | Industry, Life Sciences & Medical | 0 comments

I wanted to share my guest post over at the PharmaEvolution.com blog, Justifying New Tech Investment When the Plant Is Running Full Out.

It can often be challenging to justify investing in new technology when a plant has spare capacity, as Michalle Adkins mentioned recently in an Emerson Process Experts blog post. It’s somewhat easier, she says, when the pharmaceutical plant is operating at capacity, in a situation where they can’t produce or release another lot, even if they could sell it.

Adkins noted that financial justification for automation technology projects is typically easier in this scenario. The items discussed in the aforementioned post are still relevant, and can be used as part of the justification. However, in this scenario, it’s important to understand the waste and the bottleneck components of the processes — discards, delays in production, and delays in the release processes.

In addition to effectively reducing wasted materials and minimizing discarded or partially discarded lots, the bottleneck of the overall process must be identified. Once this is understood, turnover times, scheduled and unscheduled downtime, deviations, and documentation errors associated with the bottlenecks in the production and the release processes should be analyzed.

Batch-to-batch turnover is the time it takes from the end of one batch to prepare the production vessel, areas, or lines for the next batch. This process typically involves clean-in-place (CIP) operations for the most processing equipment, cleaning and changing parts for oral solid dosage formulation equipment, and line clearances and changing parts for packaging equipment.

The bottleneck is the first item that must be determined in order to make any significant impact on the throughput of the facility. The root causes for any bottlenecks in the production process and the release process must be determined in order to ensure that product can be released faster even as the production throughput is increased. Additionally, the root causes for unscheduled downtime should be determined (particularly at the bottleneck step).

Downtime, whether scheduled or unscheduled, directly impacts capacity — not only the duration of the downtime, but also during the shutdown, CIP, and startup sequences to get the batches running. When running at capacity, the windows for scheduled downtime can be extremely small. Automation can play a large role in reducing downtime through continuous diagnosis, not only of the process conditions, but also of the instrumentation and production assets, such as control valves, pumps/agitators and motors, mixers, dryers, etc.

Early detection of abnormal conditions can allow operator and maintenance activities to prevent a failure during the batch, and take appropriate corrective action to prevent the loss of a batch.

Deviations and discrepancies can be addressed by capturing real-time process and workflow information for the electronic batch record as the batch progresses. Operations Management software, in combination with the process control system, can detect conditions before these deviations and discrepancies occur, while there is still time to fix the issue and save the batch.

The current method of operations often includes paper batch records and manual data transcriptions throughout the work process. If this is the case, batch release times may not be optimal due to the time involved with resolving errors and deviations prevalent in the paper paradigm — paper record reviews by the Quality and Production departments. Improving these work processes requires building organizational consensus in the project conception and identification of requirements.

A cross-functional team representing Operations, Quality, IT, Engineering, Automation, Plant Management, Corporate Management, and Validation departments is essential in moving forward with a change to the status quo.

Adkins recommends prototyping as a way to visually show how the requirements generated by the cross-functional team can streamline the workflows with the use of operations management technology. This prototype becomes a mechanism of communication for the operations management approach, as well as the project implementation and validation strategy. (Just as a picture or diagram is worth a thousand words when it comes to communicating ideas, a prototype is worth a 100 pages of user requirements.)

Since optimization requires technology and workflow changes, it’s important to have this cross-functional team working together to understand and support the improvements. From initial idea and project inception through project completion, it is imperative to have the right team involved, because there is more at stake than just technology. Organizational change management is also a key part of an ultimately successful solution.

Make sure to check out the numerous comments on the original PharmaEvolution.com post and share your thoughts.

Popular Posts



Related Posts

Follow Us

We invite you to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest news, events and innovations that will help you face and solve your toughest challenges.

Do you want to reuse or translate content?

Just post a link to the entry and send us a quick note so we can share your work. Thank you very much.

Our Global Community

Emerson Exchange 365

The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of the authors. Content published here is not read or approved by Emerson before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Emerson.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com