Avoiding Shutdowns with Accurate Level Measurement

by | Aug 30, 2011 | Industrial Energy & Onsite Utilities, Industry, Level, Measurement Instrumentation | 0 comments

For plants and mills that use steam in the production process, measuring the steam condensate level accurately can be the difference between operating reliably and fighting unplanned shutdowns. So was the case for a U.S. ethanol producer, Absolute Energy, as told in a story by ConnectingIndustry.com’s Automation magazine.

The story, Technology resolves costly shutdowns at ethanol plant, describes an application with a condensate receiver tank on a steam heat exchanger. For those that don’t use steam in their production process, these tanks collect water that has condensed from steam and return it for reuse, divert it to storage, or discharge it for wastewater treatment.

In this application, level control was critical:

…to continuous operation of the heat exchanger and molecular sieve dehydration process. If water levels get too high in the receiver, temperatures in the heat exchanger drop, which can cause wet ethanol to enter the molecular sieve beds forcing the process to shut down and the ethanol-water mixture to be reprocessed.

For this plant, shutdowns cost €13,500 ($19,500 USD) per hour. After a shutdown, which occurred every few weeks, it takes 20-30 minutes to restart the process. The startup consumes additional energy over and above steady-state operation. If the sieve beds get wet:

…the process shutdown lasts between 36 and 48 hours because the beds must be shut down, regenerated, and restarted. While this type of upset is not common, wet sieve bed occurrences eventually lead to extensive equipment damage that combined cost over €135,000 [$195,000 USD].

The existing level measurement was based on differential pressure (DP) measurement. Pressure changes caused wide variations in the “wet leg”. The changing density of the condensate also impacted the measurement. Together, these pressure and density changes led to level measurement inaccuracies, which caused the level in the tank to rise too high. This in turn, caused:

…wet ethanol to enter the molecular sieve beds forcing the process to shut down and the ethanol-water mixture to be reprocessed.

The solution was to replace the DP level measurement with guided wave radar (GWR) technology. The accuracy of the guided wave radar technology is not impacted by changing pressure and density conditions. The project team installed a Rosemount 5301 Guided Wave Radar and 9901 Chamber. The chamber provided a way to mount the GWR externally to the tank.

The article sums up the project results:

The improved control of levels in the condensate receiver means this measurement point is no longer a maintenance headache. As a result, Absolute Energy has increased plant availability, decreased energy and utilities costs, reduced maintenance costs, and lowered risk of equipment damage.

Author

Follow Us

We invite you to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest news, events and innovations that will help you face and solve your toughest challenges.

Do you want to reuse or translate content?

Just post a link to the entry and send us a quick note so we can share your work. Thank you very much.

Our Global Community

Emerson Exchange 365

The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of the authors. Content published here is not read or approved by Emerson before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Emerson.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com